some effective socio-economic deterrents and facilitatings of divorce

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

On the basis of theoretical approaches, in this article, we study some effective socio-economic determinants and facilitating s on increasing and decreasing of divorce probability. It has been pointed out to roles of some background factors such as urbanization, couples’ ages at time of marriage, and ethnic background as social factors. Among effective economic factors on divorce we study the roles of parents, economic support, woman economic independence and women employment from a Beckerian perspective. Among social factors we study the roles of social learning, religious and family belongings, and commitment to traditional roles.
 

Keywords

References

  • ×   احمدی موحد، محمد. «شاخص­های ازدواج و طلاق و بررسی تغییرات آن در کشور با تاکید بر آمارهای استانی طی سال های 86-81 »، جمعیت، ش 63/64 ، (1387).

    ×   امیر خسروی، ارژنگ. «مرور مقدماتی آمارهای طلاق دهساله اخیر کشور»، جمعیت، ش36/35 ، (بهار و تابستان 1380).

    ×   بهرامی، سیاوش. بررسی جامعه­شناسی عوامل مؤثر بر میزان گرایش به طلاق در شهرستان کرمانشاه، (پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، مازندران، دانشگاه مازندران، 1386).

    ×   دل رحم، عزت­الله. «آمارهای ازدواج و طلاق ثبت شده کشور در سالهای 1371 تا 1378»، جمعیت، ش34/33، (پاییز و زمستان 1379).

    ×   رضایی، حاتم. بررسی و مقایسه نوع سبک­های مقابله­ای در مردان و زنان عادی با مردان و زنان متقاضی طلاق در شهرستان مریوان، (پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، 1386).

    ×    سروستانی، رحمت­الله.  انسان و شهرنشینی، نامه علوم اجتماعی، 226-197، (1369).

    ×   ـــــــــــــ . انسان و شهرنشینی. نامه علوم اجتماعی.ج 2، ش1،205 (1369).

    ×   علیزاده ، مرجان. «بررسی روند آمار ازدواج و طلاق های ثبت شده کشور از سال 79 تا 84» ، جمعیت، ش 55 و ش 56، (1385).

    ×   عیسی­زاده، سعید؛ اسماعیل بلالی و علی محمد قدسی. «تحلیل اقتصادی طلاق»، مطالعات راهبردی زنان، ش50، (1389).

    ×   قدسی، علی محمد. بررسی جامعه­شناختی رابطه بین حمایت اجتماعی و افسردگی، (رساله دکتری جامعه شناسی، تهران، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس تهران، 1382، 98-92).

    ×   گلشن، صیاد. بررسی طلاق و عوامل اجتماعی – جمعیت شناختی مؤثر بر آن شهرستان خوی، (پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه تهران، 1372).

    ×   ملتفت، حسین. بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر گرایش زوجین به طلاق در شهرستان داراب، (پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد، شیراز، دانشگاه شیراز، 1381).

    ×   مهدیخانی سرو جهانی، لیلا. زنان و طلاق در اسلام­شهر (پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد) (تهران، دانشگاه الزهرا، 1383).

    • Adegoke, T. G. 2010. Socio-cultural Factors as Determinants of Divorce Rates among Women of Reproductive Age in Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria , Stud Tribes Tribals, 8)2(, 107-114. 
    • Baker,G.S 1981. A treatise on the family , Cambridge,Harwrad university press.
    • Baker,G.S 1974. A theory of marriage, part 2; the journal of political economy, 82) 2(,22.
    • Baker,G.S 1993. The Economic way of Looking at Behavior; the journal of political economy, 101) 3 (,395.
    • Bowlus,A.B; Seitz,N.S. 2002. Domestic violence, employment and divorce;the history of the family,9(17(24-29.
    • Brines,G & Joyner,K1999. The tines that bind: principals of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage, American sociological review, 64, 333-355.
    • Bumpass,L.L ,Martin,T.c & Sweet,J.A 1991. The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption, journal of family issues, 12,22-42.
    • Call,V.R.; Heaton,T.B. 1997. Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for scientific study of religion,36.382-392.
    • Cherlin,A.J 1981.Marriage,divorce,remarriage,Cambridge: Harwrad university press.
    • Cigno.A. 1991. Economics of family .Oxford University Press .87.
    • De Graff, P.M; Matthijs,K. 2006.Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce:a comparison of marriage chohorts in the Netherlands. European sociological review, 22)5(,561-572.
    • Emerson,M.O. 1996. Throug thinned glasses:religion,world views ,and attitudes toward legalized abortion.Journal for scientific study of religion,35,4-55.
    • Fischer,c.s 1995. The subcultural theory of urbanism: a twentieth-year assessment, American journal of sociology, 101,543-517
    • Fokkema,T;Liefbroer,A.C. 2004. Employment and divorce among Dutch women born between 1903-1937. The history of the family.9,425-442.
    •  Greenstein,T.N 1990. marital disruption and the employment of married women, journal of marriage and family,52,657-676
    •  Haskey, J. 1996. Divorce and children : fact proven and interval between petition and decree, population trends, 84, 28-32
    • Hogg, Michael & Vaughan, Graham M 2002. Social  Psychology,3rd ed, Prentice Hall.
    • Jones,R.A. 1986. Emile Durkheim;an introduction to four mager works.B evely Hills,CA;Sage publication,82-114
    • Kapinus,C.A. 2004.The effect of parents, attitudes toward divorce on offspring  attitudes:gender and parental divorce as mediating factors .Journal of family issues.25,112-135.
    • Kapinus,C.A.;Pellerin ,L.A. 2008. The influence of parents,religious practices on young adults ,divorce attitudes.Social Science Review,37,801-814.
    • Klijzing,E 1992. wedding in the Netherlands: first-union disruption among men and women born between 1928 and 1965, European sociological review,8,53-70.
    • Lutfey, Karen and Jeylan Mortimer 2003. “Development and Socialization through the Adult Life Course.” Pp. 183-202 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John DeLamater. New York Kluwer-Plenum.
    • Marting, D) 1994(. dynamics in marriage and cohabitation: an inter-temporal life course analysis of first union formation and dissolution, amesterdam,thesis publishers, dissertation.
    • Matthijs,K;Poortman,Annee-Rigt 2006.His or her divorce?The gendered nature of divorced and its determinants.European sociological review, 22)2(,201-214.
    •  mcLanahan,S & Bumpass,L 1988. intergenerational consequences of family disruption, American journal of sociology, 94,130-152.
    • Norton, A.J; Noorman, J.E 1987. Current trends in marriage and divorce among women. Journal of arriage and family.49, 33-40.
    • Poortman , Anne-Rigt 2005.Women’s work and divorce matter of anticipation? A research note. European sociological review,21)3(,301-309.
    • Poortman,A.R & Klamijn,M  2002. women’s labour market position and divorce in Netherlands: evaluating economic interpretations of work effect, European journal of population, 18, 175-202
    • Sandstrom, Glenn 2011.Socio-economic determinants of divorce in early twenty-century Sweden.The history of the family,16,292-302.
    • Simmel, George 1965. secrecy and group communication, In : Parsons et al (Ed) Theories of society , The free press, 318-330
    • South,S.J & Spitze,G 1989. Determinants of divorce over marital life course, American sociological review, 51, 583-590
    • Stevenson, Betsey and Wolfers, Justin 2007. Marriage and Divorce: Changes and their Driving Forces, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21) 2( , 27–52.
    • Taylor,L.W. 2003. suicide as secondary deviance,A thesis in sociology,Texes Tech.University Press.
    • Tzeng,J.M & Mare,R.D 1995. labour market and socioeconomic effects on marital stability, Social Science Research, 24, 329-351
    • Waite,L.J;Lillard L.A. 1991. Children and marital disruption .American Journal of Sociology,96,930-995.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics