Mothers, Daughters, and Marriage (Intergenerational Differences in Marriage Attitudes in the City of Yazd, Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran

3 Ph.D Scholar and Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran

Abstract

Intergenerational change in family attitudes and behaviours is one of main areas of demographic researches in recent years. In this study we examine gradual shift in marriage attitudes and values by comparing the extent of intergenerational differences and similarities between married mothers and their adolescent children. A unique dataset collected through a face-to-face survey interview in the city of Yazd, have been used for the study. A sub-sample of participants consists of 155 mother-daughter dyads were selected for analysis.
Findings indicate that there is an intergenerational consensus on ideal age at marriage, and opposition to polygamous marriage, reflecting a high stability in these attitudinal domains. On the contrary, there are also significant intergenerational disagreements on such attitudinal items as timing of first birth, relative (consanguine) marriage, mode of mate selection, and attitude towards singlehood, with daughters' attitudes tend to be more modern. These intergenerational differences in marriage attitudes could be attributable to both ideational shift as well as intergenerational differences in socio-economic status including higher education, wage employment and urban origins of daughter generation. Although intensity of intergenerational differences in our research site is not profound, results are indicative of a gradual change in family values and attitudes in Iran.

Keywords

References

  • ×   امانی، مهدی (1380)، «نگاهی به چهل سال تحول جمعیت‏شناختی ازدواج در ایران 75-1335»، نامه علوم اجتماعی، ش 17. صص. 46-33.

    ×   آزادارمکی، تقی (1386)، جامعه‏شناسی خانواده ایرانی، تهران: انتشارات سمت.

    ×   آزاد ارمکی، تقی؛ زند، مهناز؛ خزایی، طاهره (1379)، «بررسی تحولات اجتماعی و فرهنگی در طول سه نسل خانواده تهرانی»، نامه علوم اجتماعی، ش 16، صص 29-3.

    ×   سرایی، حسن (1385)، «تداوم و تغییر خانواده در جریان گذار جمعیتی ایران»، نامه انجمن جمعیت‏شناسی ایران، ش2، صص 60-37.

    ×   صادقی، رسول؛ قدسی، علی‎محمد؛ افشارکهن، جواد (1386)، «واکاوی مسئله ازدواج و اعتبارسنجی یک راه‏حل»، پژوهش زنان، دوره 5، ش1، صص 108-83. 

    ×   عباسی‏شوازی، محمدجلال؛ عسکری‏ندوشن، عباس (1387)، «آرمان­گرایی در توسعه و نگرش‫های مرتبط با خانواده در ایران: مطالعه موردی در شهر یزد»، نامه علوم اجتماعی، ش34، صص 72-49.

    ×   عباسی‫شوازی، محمدجلال؛ ترابی، فاطمه (1385)، «تفاوت‫های بین نسلی ازدواج خویشاوندی در ایران»، نامه انجمن جامعه‫شناسی ایران، دوره هفتم، ش4، صص 119-146.

    ×   عباسی‏شوازی، محمدجلال؛ صادقی، رسول (1384)، «قومیت و الگوهای ازدواج در ایران»، پژوهش زنان، دوره 3، ش1، صص47-25.

    ×   عبداللهیان، حمید (1383)، «نسل‫ها و نگرش‫های جنسیتی: سنجش آگاهی از تعارض در نگرش‫های جنسیتی»، پژوهش زنان، دوره 2، ش3، صص 84-57. 

    ×   عسکری‏ندوشن، عباس (1388)، «آرمانگرایی توسعه و تغییرات خانواده (با تأکید بر متغیرهای جمعیتی در ایران): مطالعه موردی در شهر یزد»، پایان‏نامه دکترای جمعیت‏شناسی، دانشگاه تهران.

    ×   قائمی، علی (1363)، «نظام حیات خانواده در اسلام» تهران: انتشارات انجمن اولیا و مربیان.

     

    • Ø Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J., P. McDonald and M. Hossein-Chavoshi, (2003), “Change in Family, Fertility Behavior and Attitudes in Iran”, Working Paper in Demography, 88, Canberra: The AustralianNationalUniversity.
    • Ø Abbasi-Shavazi M. J., P. McDonald and M. Hosseini-Chavoshi (2008a), “The Family and Social Change in Post-Revolutionary Iran.” In K. M. Yount and H. Rashad (eds), Family in the Middle East: Ideational Change in Egypt, Iran, and Tunisia, New York: Routledge. Pp. 217-235.
    • Ø Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., P. McDonald and M. Hosseini-Chavoshi (2008b), “Modernization or Cultural Maintenance: The Practice of Consanguineous Marriage in Iran,” Journal of Biosocial Science, 40: 911-933.
    • Ø Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., S. P. Morgan, M. Hosseini-Chavoshi and P. McDonald (Forthcoming), “Family Change and Continuity in Iran: Birth Control Use before First Pregnancy”, Journal of Marriage and Family.
    • Ø Aghajanian, A. (1986), “Some Notes on Divorce in Iran.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 749–755.
    • Ø Amato, P. (1996), “Explaining the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58: 628 – 640.
    • Ø Annie Kao, T. S, B. Guthrie and C. Loveland-Cherry (2007), An “Intergenerational Approach to Understanding Taiwanese American Adolescent Girls' and Their Mothers' Perceptions about Sexual Health”, Journal of Family Nursing, 13(3):312-332.
    • Ø Askari-Nodoushan, A., T. Aghayarihir, A. Ahmadi and A. Mehryar (2006), “Changing Mate Selection Pattern in Iran”, Paper Presented at the International Conference on Emerging Population Issues in the Asian-Pacific Region: Challenges for the 21st Century, Mumbai, 10-13 December 2006.
    • Ø Axinn, W. G., and A. Thornton (1993), “Mothers, children and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior”, American Sociological Review, 58, Pp. 233 – 246.
    • Ø Barber, J. (2001), “The Intergenerational Transmission of Age at First Birth among Married and Unmarried Men and Women”, Social Science Research, 30: 219 – 247.
    • Ø Bauer, J. (1984), “New Models and Traditional Networks: Migrant Women in Tehran”, In J. T. Fawcett, S. Khoo, and P. Smith (eds). Women in the Cities of Asia: Migration and Urban Adaptation, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
    • Ø Bauer, J. (1985), “Demographic Change, Women and the Family in a Migrant Neighborhood of  Tehran”, In A. Fathi (ed.) Women and the Family in Iran, Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill. pp: 158-186.
    • Ø Cleland, J., and C.R. Wilson (1987), “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View”, Population Studies 41(1): 5–30.
    • Ø Friedl, E. (2003), “Tribal Enterprises and Marriage Issues in Twentieth-Century Iran”, In B. Doumani (ed). Family History in the Middle East: Household, Property and Gender, State University of New York.
    • Ø Givens B.P. & C. Hirschman (1994), “Modernization and Consanguineous Marriage in Iran”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(4): 820-834.
    • Ø Good, W. (1963), “World Revolution and Family Patterns”, London: Free Press of Glencoe.
    • Ø Gulick, J. and M.E. Gulick (1978), “The Domestic Social Environment of Women and Girls in Isfahan, Iran”, In L. Beck and N. Keddie (eds). Women in the Muslim World, Cambridge, Massachusetts: HarvardUniversity Press.
    • Ø Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., P. McDonald, and M. J. Abbasi-Shavazi (2006), The Iranian Fertility Decline, 1981-1999: “An Application of the Synthetic Parity Progression Ratio Method”, Population, 61(5/6): 701-718.
    • Ø Kertzer, L .D. (1993), “Generation as a Sociological Problem”, Annual Review of Sociology, 9: 125-149.
    • Ø Lesthaeghe, R. & J. Surkyn (1988), “Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change”, Population and Development Review, 14(1): 1-45.
    • Ø Lesthaeghe, R. (1995), “The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation”, Pp.17-61, In K. O. Mason & A-M. Jensen (ed.s), Gender and Family Change in Industrial Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Ø Malhotra A, A. Tsui, and V. de Silva (1992), “Mothers, Daughters and Marriage: Explaining Similarity in Generational Perceptions in Sri Lanka”, Unpublished Report. In www.popline.org
    • Ø Ryder, N. B. (1965), “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change”, American Sociological Review, 30(6): 843-861.
    • Ø Sharma, N, V. Sumati and A. Kesar (2005), “Intergenerational Differences in the Concept of Marriage among Dogra Brahmin Females (Mothers and Daughters) ”, Anthropologist, 7(4): 253-256.
    • Ø Shebloski, B. and J. L. Gibbons (1998), “Intergenerational Patterns in Beliefs about Women's Roles among Adolescents and Their Parents in the Czech Republic”, Cross-Cultural Research, 32(3): 241-256.
    • Ø Tashakkori, A. & VD. Thompson (1988), “Cultural Change and Attitude Change: An Assessment of Post-revolutionary Marriage and Family Attitudes in Iran”, Population Research and Policy Review, 7(1): 3-27.
    • Ø Teachman, J. D. and D. A. Heckert (1985), “The Declining Significance of First-Birth Timing”, Demography, 22(2): 185-198.
    • Ø Thornton, A. (1989), “Changing Attitudes toward Family Issues in the United States”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51: 873-893.
    • Ø Thornton, A. (2001), “The Developmental Paradigm, Reading History Sideways and Family Change”, Demography, 38(4): 449-465.
    • Ø Thornton, A. (2005), “Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life”, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Ø Tremayne, S. (2006), “Modernity and Early Marriage in Iran: A View from Within”, Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 2(1): 65-94.
    • Ø Trussell, J. and J. Menken (1978), “Early Childbearing and Subsequent Fertility”, Family Planning Perspectives, 10: 209-218.
    • Ø Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987), “Europe’s Second Demographic Transition”, Population Bulletin, 42 (1), Washington, PRB.
    • Ø Van de Kaa, D.J. (2001), “Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behavior”, Population and Development Review, 27(Supp.): 290-331.
Women's Strategic Studies
Volume 11, Issue 44
December 2009
Pages 7-36

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics