Gender and Linguistic Gender in the Holy Quran

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Linguistics Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

In linguistics, linguistic gender is distinguished from the biological one. Despite the existence of a relation between the two, linguistic studies indicate that the relationship is not isomorphic. Language of the Holy Quran, also known as Classical Arabic, exhibits an extensive variation in the use and types of linguistic gender. This research provides a new classification of this type of gender, different from the ones already presented in traditional grammars of Arabic, based on the language of the Holy Quran and adopting the Markedness Theory in linguistics. The results may prove useful both in the linguistic interpretation of the Quranic verses, especially those related to women and their significance in the Holy Quran, and in offering language researchers a new and different approach to the analysis of the Arabic language and grammar.

Keywords


  • ×   قرآن کریم

    ×   حناترزی، فؤاد (1969م)، فی اصول اللغه و النحو، بیروت: مکتبة البنان.

    ×   زاهدی، کیوان (1387)، «زبان، فرهنگ و تفکر: دیدگاه­ها و برهان­ها», فصل­نامه تحقیقات فرهنگی، ش 4.  

    ×   سیدی، سید حسین (1387)، رویکرد زبانشناختی به نحو عربی، مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی.

    ×   صبحی، صالح (1973م)، دراسات فی فقه اللغه، بیروت: دارالعلم.

    ×   عبدالتواب، رمضان (1367)، مباحثی در فقه اللغه و زبان شناسی عربی، (ترجمة حمیدرضا شیخی)، مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس.

    ×   العلوی، هادی (1983م)، المعجم العربی الجدید، دمشق: دارالحوار.

    ×   عون، حسن (1952م)، اللغه والنحو، بی جا.

    ×   مبارک، مازن (1981م)، النحو العربی، بیروت: دارالفکر.

    ×   المبارک، محمد (1972م)، فقه اللغه و خصایص العربیه، بیروت: دار الفکر.

    ×   مخزونی، مهدی (1950م)، فی النحو العربی، بغداد: دارالمعرفه.

     

    • Ø َAksenof, A.T. 1984. K probleme ekstralingvisticeskoj motivacii grammaticeskoj kategorii roda. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 33: 14-25.
    • Ø Badawi, El-Said; Michael G. Carter and Adrian Gully (2004), Modern Written Arabic: A Comprehensive Grammar,New York: Routledge.
    • Ø Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren A. Schmidt and Web Phillips (2003), Sex, Syntax and Semantics, In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language inMind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Ø Cameron, Deborah (1995), Verbal Hygiene, London and New York: Routledge.
    • Ø Cameron, Deborah (2003), Gender and Language Ideologies, In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ø Corbett, Greville (1991), Gender, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
    • Ø Hocket, Charles F. (1958), A Course in Modern Linguistics, New York: Macmillan.
    • Ø Kendall, Shari (2003), Creating Gendered Demeanors of Authority at Work and at Home, In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ø Lakoff, Robin (2003), Language, Gender and Politics: Putting “Women” and “Power” in the Same Sentence, In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ø Trechter, Sara (2003), A Marked Man: The Contexts of Gender and Ethnicity, In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Ø Zahedi, Keivan and Mahtab Haydarynia (2008), A Comparative Study of Arabic, Spanish, French, English and Persian Speakers’ Conception of Linguistic Gender, Manuscript, Tehran: ShahidBeheshtiUniversity.